Oil & Gas | PROCUREMENT | TECHNICAL BID EVALUATION

Technical Bid Evaluation Software for Capital Projects

Kissflow scores every bidder against the same locked weighted criteria, routes clarifications with a real deadline, and produces a single recommendation record with every score attached, instead of three engineers editing the same spreadsheet at once.

Technical Bid Evaluation Management System

Trusted by energy operators worldwide

Puma Energy
TotalEnergies
Unioil
McDermott
Essar
Modec

Three bidders, one scope, and a spreadsheet that three different engineers are editing at the same time.

A technical bid evaluation asks a small committee, process, mechanical, instrumentation, whoever the scope touches, to score competing bids against the same weighted criteria and flag exceptions to spec before a bid can move to commercial negotiation. Run on a shared spreadsheet, that process invites overwritten scores, missed clarification deadlines, and a recommendation memo reconstructed from whoever remembers the reasoning weeks later. A tab per evaluator holds that person's scores. It can't lock the criteria set so nobody scores against a different standard, track a clarification back to a bidder with a real deadline, or produce one recommendation record the moment evaluation closes.

Kissflow gives every evaluator their own scoring form against one locked criteria set, checks every bid against the technical spec with exceptions flagged automatically, tracks clarifications to bidders with a response deadline and escalation if overdue, and produces one consolidated recommendation with every score attached before it routes for sign-off.

A project engineer auditing the award later sees exactly how each bidder scored, not three engineers' memory of an overwritten spreadsheet.

Where technical bid evaluation loses its own audit trail

Scoring criteria drift between evaluators

One reviewer weights schedule heavily, another weights it lightly, and nobody agreed on that up front.

Scores get overwritten on a shared file

Two evaluators editing the same spreadsheet at once means one person's input quietly disappears.

Clarification requests to bidders have no deadline

A question sent to a bidder sits unanswered for two weeks with nobody tracking whether it's overdue.

The recommendation isn't traceable back to individual scores

Six months later, nobody can show exactly why bidder B lost points on the compliance matrix.

Six modules. Every bid scored against locked criteria, every clarification tracked, and one recommendation record with the full audit trail.

Configure your scoring criteria, weighting, and evaluation committee to your bid package.

Weighted scoring criteria

A locked criteria set and weighting apply to every bidder, so no evaluator scores against a different standard.

Individual evaluator scoring

Each committee member scores independently against the same criteria, with scores attributed and timestamped.

Compliance matrix

Every bid is checked line by line against the technical spec, with exceptions flagged automatically as they're found.

Clarification routing

A question routed to a bidder carries a response deadline, with overdue clarifications escalated automatically.

Recommendation and sign-off

A consolidated recommendation is produced from every evaluator's score, routed for technical sign-off before negotiation.

Evaluation dashboard

Every bid package's evaluation status, in progress, clarifications pending, or recommended, rolls up in one view.

From request to system of record in four steps

Submit

Submit

A bid package opens with its locked scoring criteria, weighting, and assigned evaluation committee.

Review

Review

Each evaluator scores independently and flags any compliance-matrix exceptions against the spec, and clarifications go back to bidders with a response deadline tracked to closure.

Approve

Approve

A consolidated recommendation with every score attached routes for technical sign-off.

Record

Record

The recommendation record is retained with every score attached, instead of three engineers editing one spreadsheet at once.

What changes when technical bid evaluation runs on Kissflow

Process
Before Kissflow
On Kissflow
Scoring criteria
Interpreted differently by each evaluator
Locked and applied consistently to every bid
Score entry
A shared spreadsheet, edits can overwrite each other
Individual, attributed scoring forms per evaluator
Compliance check
A manual line-by-line read against the spec
A structured matrix with exceptions flagged automatically
Clarifications
Sent by email, no tracked deadline
Routed with a deadline and escalation if overdue
Recommendation
Reconstructed from memory and email threads
Generated from every attached score and comment
Audit trail
Scattered across emails and spreadsheet versions
One record per bid package, fully traceable
Process Before Kissflow On Kissflow
Scoring criteria Interpreted differently by each evaluator Locked and applied consistently to every bid
Score entry A shared spreadsheet, edits can overwrite each other Individual, attributed scoring forms per evaluator
Compliance check A manual line-by-line read against the spec A structured matrix with exceptions flagged automatically
Clarifications Sent by email, no tracked deadline Routed with a deadline and escalation if overdue
Recommendation Reconstructed from memory and email threads Generated from every attached score and comment
Audit trail Scattered across emails and spreadsheet versions One record per bid package, fully traceable

Connects to your ERP for the resulting purchase order once the bid is awarded; Kissflow doesn't replace your system of record

Kissflow runs the technical scoring, compliance matrix, and recommendation workflow. Your ERP stays the system of record for the purchase order once commercial negotiation and award are complete.

Integration logoIntegration logo
Integration logoIntegration logo
Integration logoIntegration logo
Integration logoIntegration logo
Integration logoIntegration logo
Integration logoIntegration logo
Integration logoIntegration logo
Integration logoIntegration logo
Integration logoIntegration logo
Integration logoIntegration logo
Integration logoIntegration logo
Integration logoIntegration logo
Integration logoIntegration logo
Integration logoIntegration logo
Integration logoIntegration logo
Integration logoIntegration logo
Integration logoIntegration logo
Integration logoIntegration logo
Integration logoIntegration logo
Integration logoIntegration logo
Integration logoIntegration logo
Integration logoIntegration logo
Integration logoIntegration logo
Integration logoIntegration logo
Integration logoIntegration logo
Integration logoIntegration logo
Integration logoIntegration logo
Integration logoIntegration logo
Integration logoIntegration logo
Integration logoIntegration logo

Built for how a technical bid evaluation actually needs to hold up later, not just get through the meeting

One locked criteria set

Every bidder is scored against the same weighted standard, not whatever an individual evaluator prefers.

No overwritten scores

Each evaluator's input is attributed and preserved, not lost to a shared spreadsheet edit.

Clarifications don't go stale

A question to a bidder has a tracked deadline and escalates if it goes unanswered.

Live in weeks

Configure your scoring criteria and evaluation committee in the visual builder, or describe the use case to the AI Builder.

Governed from day one

Role-based access and a full audit trail on every score, comment, and recommendation.

A recommendation you can defend later

Every point lost on the compliance matrix is traceable back to a specific evaluator's comment.

We help procurement and engineering teams score bids without a spreadsheet edit war

McDermott

“If a company cannot enable everybody to use AI, they will never get the true benefit of AI. Platforms like Kissflow allow us to put that capability in the hands of our users in a safe way.”

Vagesh Dave

GVP & CIO at McDermott International, Ltd

See The Full Story
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
5M+
work items processed
5,526
active users
400+
active workflow created without IT dependency
Puma Energy
INDUSTRY Energy
HEADQUATERS USA

“Advanced automation of all processes is easy to set up. I cannot imagine how to manage workflows without this software.”

Tanay Tiwary

Global Head - Digitalization & Business Improvement

See the Full Story
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
700+
Use Cases
73%
Operation Efficiency
1001 - 5000
# of Employees
SN Aboitiz Power Group

“Kissflow supports rapid application development by building a working application prototype in the shortest amount of time.”

Maria Theresa Cabigon

CIO, SN Aboitiz Power Group

See The Full Story
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
451%
ROI
2.8 months
Payback period
Previous
    Next

    See what Kissflow can do for you

    Talk to us

    Got questions? We're here to help.

    Get Support

    No. Your ERP or e-sourcing tool stays the system of record for the RFQ issuance and resulting purchase order. Kissflow runs the technical scoring and recommendation workflow that sits between them.

    This app is scoped to the pre-award technical scoring decision. Procurement Package Progress Management System tracks the package after award, through fabrication and shipment.

    Yes. Scoring criteria and weighting are configurable per bid package, so a compressor package and a bulk-materials package can use different standards.

    Yes. Bidders can be given limited, self-service access to view and respond to their own clarification requests within the tracked deadline.

    Each evaluator has their own scoring form, visible only to them and the evaluation lead until scoring closes, preventing one score from influencing another.

    This app is scoped to technical evaluation. Commercial evaluation, pricing, and negotiation are handled separately once a bid clears the technical gate.

    Configuration and AI-assisted app generation move delivery from a multi-month program to a matter of weeks.

    Kissflow is certified to SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, and ISO/IEC 27001, with role-based access and a full audit log on every score, comment, and recommendation.