Citizen development vs traditional app development
Citizen Development: |
Traditional App Development: |
|
Who develops? |
Business users with little to no coding experience. |
Professional software developers/engineers. |
Tools Used: |
Low-code/no-code platforms with visual interfaces. |
Programming languages (Python, Java, C#, etc.), IDEs, frameworks. |
Speed: |
Very fast development cycles (days to weeks). |
Longer development cycles (months to years). |
Complexity: |
Best for departmental or simple enterprise-level applications and workflows. |
Suitable for highly complex, mission-critical, and highly customized enterprise applications. |
Cost: |
Lower development and maintenance costs |
Higher development and maintenance costs. |
Control: |
Less granular control over underlying code and infrastructure. |
Complete control over every aspect of the application. |
Collaboration: |
Strong collaboration between IT and business. |
Often more siloed, with business providing requirements to IT. |
Both approaches have their place; citizen development complements traditional IT by offloading simpler requests and accelerating digital transformation.