The 21st-century business world is built on software applications. In the past, IT teams had to write several lines of code to convert business logic into intuitive software products to get work done faster and more effectively.
Today, low-code technology advancements are changing how businesses build the apps they need. According to a Gartner survey, organizations will build 70 percent of their new applications using low-code or no-code platforms by 2025.
While traditional coding will remain relevant in the future (and is the more practical solution in many cases), decision-makers now have to critically compare their options and decide on which approach to software development will be more beneficial for them. To assist you with your decision-making process, we will compare low-code to traditional software development to help you make the right choice.
Traditional development requires professional developers with manual coding expertise. Low-code development requires only a minimum coding knowledge base and offers simple, easy-to-use tools, templates, and interfaces.
With low-code development, developers don’t have to write individual lines of code to build complete software applications. To see how this compares to traditional coding, here’s a quick comparison of both approaches to software development based on various factors.
|
Low-Code |
Traditional Software Development |
Definition |
Low-code development is a visual approach that uses pre-built components and drag-and-drop interfaces to build apps. |
Traditional or custom software development is an approach to software development that involves creating apps through manual coding. |
Tools |
Rapid application development tools such as Kissflow Low-Code are used. |
Web frameworks and programming languages such as Python, Java, and PHP. |
Coding Knowledge |
Basic coding knowledge is sufficient. |
Advanced coding skills are required. |
Speed of development |
A working app can be created in less than a month. |
App development may take 6 months to 1 year. |
Customization |
Limited customization options but some solutions such as Kissflow let users add custom UI components. |
Coding from scratch is highly customizable and the application can be tailored to specific requirements. |
Agility |
Changes can be made quickly and new features can be added easily. Errors can also be fixed smoothly. |
Changes will be time-consuming and frequent modifications will result in losing the project scope. |
Deployment |
Fast delivery as apps can be created through minimal coding. |
Longer development time as apps are created from scratch. |
Quality |
Extensive integration, standard performance, and live-debugging options will keep the app error-free. |
Highly scalable and great performance. However, testing and debugging will be time-consuming. |
Maintenance |
Easy to maintain as the low-code platform handles app security, maintenance, and upgrades. |
You need a dedicated internal team to perform regular updates and maintain your custom app. |
Technical support |
Less technical support. |
More technical support. |
Template availability |
Lots of pre-built templates. |
None. It can only be built from scratch. |
Cost |
Average cost starts at $3000/month. |
Ranges between $20,000 and $50,000/app. |
Scalability |
Low-code platforms can handle variable workloads (e.g., adding more users as the organization grows) easily. |
Traditional software is difficult and costly to scale without the help of experienced software developers. |
Security |
Most low-code solutions will come with ISO 2007 and SOC2. They also comply with other important data protection regulations. |
Full dependency on the software development team to implement security measures. Security takes time and may affect quality. |
Multi-platform |
Supports multi-platform development. Most no-code apps can be made to work on mobile, web, and cloud. |
Choose between native or cross-platform development methods to make the app work on multiple platforms. |
ROI |
Highest ROI, in some cases above 80 percent. ROI is measured based on development costs, and maintenance. |
The ROI is very low compared to low-code solutions.It is typically between the range of 15-17percent |
Although there are similarities between them, low-code development and traditional coding are two distinct approaches to software development. Below are the phases of low-code development and traditional development that are generally in practice. Note that these may vary based on the nature of the project.
Parameter |
Low-Code Development |
Traditional Coding |
Resource Saving |
Low-code development requires fewer technical resources since it relies on visual development tools and pre-built components. |
It takes a large team of skilled developers and a lot of technical resources to build apps from scratch with custom code. |
ROI (Return on Investment) |
With faster development time and reduced resource cost, low-code development often leads to quicker returns on investment. |
Traditional coding tends to take a longer time to get ROI due to extended development timelines and higher resource expenses. |
Finding proper talent |
With low-code development, it is easier to find and onboard citizen developers or business users with limited technical expertise and get them to build needed solutions. |
It requires specialized and skilled developers. But there’s an ongoing shortage in tech talent, projected to reach 85.2 million developers and engineers by 2030. |
Quality |
Suited for less complex applications and rapid development but may have limitations in customization and scalability. Quality depends on the low-code platform. |
High customization and control, allowing for the development of complex software solutions. Quality is often determined by the expertise of the development team. |
The right low-code development platform will simplify and accelerate the creation of functional software applications. However, the efficiency of your low-code development process depends significantly on the features of your chosen low-code platform. To choose the best low-code solution, the following are some of the critical factors to consider:
An intuitive low-code solution lets users create app interfaces by simply dragging and dropping components onto a design canvas. This approach reduces the need for manual coding of UI elements, making application development accessible to non-developers.
Low-code platforms prioritize mobility. Developers can design responsive user interfaces and implement specific features using prebuilt components or modifying templates. This makes it easier and faster to develop applications for various devices and platforms.
Modern low-code platforms include built-in security features to protect applications and user data. They comply with industry standards for application development, with advanced encryption and role-based access control to limit who can access what. Scalability is another key quality of low-code platforms, allowing applications to grow as user demands increase.
Automation is a core aspect of low-code development. These platforms provide tools for automating workflows and business processes, reducing manual efforts in enterprise software apps.
Many low-code platforms support seamless integration with DevOps processes. This ensures that the development, testing, and deployment of applications can be part of a continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipeline. This promotes efficient software delivery and makes it easier to implement updates when necessary.
Many Low-code platforms also offer case management capabilities. This allows organizations to manage complex business processes, cases, tickets, and workflows from a centralized hub.
Data integration is crucial for building applications that interact with various internal and external low-code platforms that provide connectors, APIs, and data mapping tools to facilitate the integration and querying of data from databases, third-party services, and legacy systems.
Low-code/no-code platforms are the right option for any startups, SMBs, mid-market, and enterprises trying to build simple solutions and deploy them quickly. The following are practical scenarios where using a low-code platform is an ideal solution.
You don’t have to pick on approach a winner, and in that sense, there is no battle between the two. The right approach to you depends on what is being built and how you want to build it and in some cases, both options are viable and practical.
Contrary to common expectations, no-code isn’t out to depose or replace traditional programming. In fact, traditional software development remains relevant due to the unmatched freedom and flexibility it provides.
So, a truce can be called to combine traditional programming and low-code platforms. Blending beneficial practices of low-code into a conventional development life cycle will facilitate faster time-to-market and process optimization.
Combining the best of both worlds will also allow the creation of high-quality enterprise-grade application solutions. For example, low-code can be used to develop the core functionality and the programming team can come in later to create complex and tailored functions. Overall, they’re a great pair and can bring significant business value.
Ready to start leveraging the unique benefits of low-code development? Get Kissflow today to start building apps faster.