August 25th, 2016 • marketing processes
The debate on mass email marketing never stops. And every now and then, someone pulls off a nice story about personalized email marketing, or perhaps I should say ‘Extremely Personalized’ email marketing. By extremely personalized I mean an email that is meant only for one individual. We at KiSSFLOW had the same dilemma: which one was more effective? So we decided to run a A/B test on this.
We picked 200 contacts of identical profile (e.g. job title, size of the company, industry, geography). For 100 contacts, we sent mass emails with some simple personalization like addressing them with first name. For the other 100 contacts, we did deep research about them on social media and wrote very personal opening lines to them before asking them for a click.
Here are the results from this A/B test activity.
MM = Mass Mailing /// PM = Personalized Mailing.
The extremely personalized email marketing results are stunning. The open rate is 500% better than the mass mailing and the click rate is more than 200%.
But here’s the catch. The above table doesn’t tell the full story. The thing that is hidden is the effort that required to do either of the activities. Look that table below so that you get the full picture.
A really great email marketer might be able to squeak out 20 of these extremely personalized emails a day. So it takes five full working days to send 100 emails. In that same period, his counterpart doing mass email marketing could have sent out 4000 emails and produced 80 clicks. You may ask, Why not send 40,000 or even 4 million emails? There is significant effort in gathering email databases for the target market we are addressing and curating. We use various SaaS software for this task. We also have internal tools that we run by to check for invalid email addresses and other checks. This all involves manual work and the best anyone can do is 800 curated emails in a day with less than a 10% bounce rate.
So the summary is, purely looking at the numbers, targeted Mass Emailing seems to produce better numbers than extremely personalized emails.
How does this stack up with your experience? Please comment.
There isn’t any paper in the copier. You should…
You had to use your own money to buy lunch for a customer who dropped by. You should…
You have a workplace complaint to register. You should…
An irate customer complains about the service they received. You should...
You had a great idea for a company blog post while on a client visit. You should…
Your email account seems to have stopped receiving emails. You should…
You want to do a quick training for new hires on some new software. You should…
out of 28
Looks like you’ve got things covered. You are well on your way to an automated office. If you need an easier way to build your own automated workflows, sign up for a free trial of KiSSFLOW today.
out of 28
You’ve worked in worse places, but that’s not saying much. Your workflows may be stuck in the paper age, and efficiency is a daily struggle. Make the leap and see what KiSSFLOW can do for you!
out of 28
Chaos is alive and well with you. You can’t trust your current processes, and only the strong get expenses paid on time. KiSSFLOW can open a new world for you, if you survive this one!
out of 28
Your office is so chaotic, it’s almost off our charts. Hats off to you for getting anything productive done during your day. You can try KiSSFLOW, but even that probably can’t help you now.
*Enterprise pricing is based on expected transaction volume and maximum number of users